Thursday, September 24, 2020
Wednesday, September 23, 2020
Time for a controversial blog post.
A properly made road will have a camber - the slight slope from the centreline to the gutters to persuade water to drain off properly. If you want to know the details, watch this not very exciting video.
Since the real road is shaped, the model road should be shaped too. But I've decided to keep the Selly Oak road flat.
- Model camber needs to be done really well. On my model, there is a T-junction and a side road as well as a considerable slope. I can mess around with plaster all I like, I think the result will look rubbish because I'll never get it smooth enough to satisfy me.
- The alternative method of putting a strip of something down the middle and then bending the road surface over the top is fine - until we get to the junction when it's back out with the plaster to try and blend things together.
- On the real road, when you are standing on it, the camber isn't very noticeable.
- I want to take photos on the model and the buses should be upright. Real vehicles have suspension, model ones don't. The bus in the photo above might be right, but would look odd in a model pic. I think the effects of the lens are more responsible for any lean than the road too.
In conclusion, the road will be flat because I believe I can make a good-looking, flat road and I don't believe many people will notice. This probably makes me a rubbish modeller unworthy of owning a copy of MRJ. That's fine. I'm a long way from the world's best modeller. A very long way.
But I am determined to finish this project in the time available and so shortcuts are going to be taken. If that makes me a bad person, I'm a bad person.
Tuesday, September 22, 2020
With the road on place made from 3mm thick MDF, I decided that it could do with a quick coats of paint. Noth the final coat, that was going to need some messing around with tarmac colours, but something to seal the surface so it looked sort of OK in photos for magazine features.
To do this, I nicked a trick from Chris Nevard and blasted away with Halford's car primer aerosols. Using just black and grey, I shot random bursts on to the material quickly so they mixed a little.
The result isn't half bad. OK, I still need to do it properly, but for many models, this would be good enough. I've certainly seen worse in the past. Give it go, you might be pleasantly surprised.
Monday, September 21, 2020
The colour is deliberately uninspiring - a mix of beige (Woodland Scenics call it something else, but it's beige) and a mid-green. Plus "bits" that have been hoovered up and dumped back in the hopper.
This works well as a base-coat, and in the case of my project, was all I needed.There's plenty left, so I know that there will be another lawn or field that is going to get this uninspiring colour in the future.
Does anyone else have standby materials?
Sunday, September 20, 2020
Today, we enjoy a guest blog post by James Hilton.
Saturday, September 19, 2020
There's always a discussion in the model railway world about un-numbered model locos. The prevailing wisdom, based on previous attempts, is that they don't sell.
It seems the same thinking applies in the slot car world. Dave Kennedy, who has worked in the industry for years, explains.
Friday, September 18, 2020
Thursday, September 17, 2020
An Englishman's home is his castle, and if he wants one in his back garden, then he needs to buy a copy of October's Garden Rail where we will show him how to do it!
There's also gardening, some Isle of Man action, plenty of construction, news and letters.
Wednesday, September 16, 2020
Now I can start plonking things in position to get a feel for the model. The main feature is the road so this is cut from 3mm thick MDF. I know people are funny about MDF, but it's flat, stable and if thin enough (like this) can be cut with a heavy knife, albeit with many cuts.
Where the road crosses the canal, it's propped up on a couple of sanding blocks which give a pretty close approximation of the 6ft clearances on the real thing - I had to stoop to walk underneath.
The track is supported 75mm above the road on foamboard T-shapes for the moment but I'll do something more solid later.
I've lived with this for a few days, and shown it to Jason and we are both happy. The position of road, rail and canal have changed from real life, which will need to imaginative work later, but it all fits and looks nice IMHO. And if it doesn't well, it's too late as I've glued everything down by the time you read this.
Tuesday, September 15, 2020
Normally I'd use loose-pin hinges to attached baseboards together, but when I fitted them to the Selly Oak boards, for some reason we ended up with a 2mm gap. No idea why, but it wasn't good enough. Maybe fitting a hinge in the corner between the boards didn't work. Or maybe I'm just rubbish.
Anyway, it was back down to the hardware shop for bolts. This isn't so bad as the boards come with alignment thingies - you can see the spike in the photo.
Bolts are to fit a 7mm diameter hole, to match the spikes, and I bought wing-nuts and the biggest washers they sell as well. The gap is gone.
Monday, September 14, 2020
The boards come from White Rose and are excellent quality. Even I can't screw up their construction.
Both are now marked out in the 6-inch squares of the model of the model. At some point I need to take a jigsaw to the front edge of the left hand one, but that can wait a while as I measure everything up.
The good news is that the fit comfortably in my workspace, which is good news as I'll be living with them for a while.
Sunday, September 13, 2020
In the comments, a couple of people suggested I ought to look at an Olympus Pen. Reading reviews, the range appeared to score well for image quality and flexibility. The suggestion in the reviews was that this is a DSLR for compact camera user. I don't have a problem with that. As I said in my original post, I'm no specialist photographer, I just like taking photos.
I also like interesting things that are a little under the radar. A Citroen Berlingo (2nd series) is a fantastic car for example, but you never see it advertised. They are just popular with those who know how good they are, and when you learn, you understand.
An SLR for compact users will be an anathema to many "proper" photographers, but I had a look on eBay and found a few to chose from. In the end, £60 bought me an E-PL1 that had taken 572 photos and seemed in perfect nick, along with charger and lens.
Another look and the PL1 is the noddy camera of the range, but if this ever bothers me, bodies can be picked up for under £40, including a red one which appeals quite a bit.
Anyway, first impressions are good. The camera feels solid. The shutter makes a nice noise. The lens has to be unlocked and extended before use, and it's a bit ugly when not shut up. That's as bad as it gets so far.
Of course I've taken some photos. You can click on these for the full-size version.
My railcar in the garden.
While I was out there, a dragon in need of a repaint:
A home-grown pomegranate:
An aeroplane at Bekonscot on a sunny day:
And a few minutes later, a couple of trains:
All of these were taken with the camera on auto. I had tried some model shots in the booth, but the results weren't impressive. Not bad, just not what I needed. However, stick the camera in aperture mode and the dial on F22, read the instructions to set the ISO to 100 and things look a lot better.
The Lego train is 12cm long, not that dissimilar in size to this:
No need for stacking there for most uses.The focus lock seemed to work well too.
At the moment, this feels good. OK, the lens is ugly and composing on the back LCD screen isn't ideal in bright light - but then that's an issue with a compact and trying to gawp through a viewfinder too. The video mode is going to take some figuring out as efforts so far have seen it record when I didn't want it to and not when I do. That's just pressing buttons in the right order. I'm sure if I read the manual again, I'll get it.
Thanks to those who suggested the Pen. It seems like a good move. The Nikon is currently with them for investigation, but I've hung on to the lens in case I don't have the body back. It's sale will then go towards a zoom for the Olympus.
Saturday, September 12, 2020
One of the weirdest railways was the Daddy-long-legs that ran along Brighton seafront. A combination of tramcar and boat from the era when electricity was exciting and new. Sadly the line didn't last far into this* century, but there are still a few relics as the video shows.
If you fancy reading more about the line, I recommend picking up a copy of The Extraordinary Daddy-Long-Legs Railway of Brighton by Martin Easdown.
A terrific volume that is full of photos and postcards that I've never seen before. It tells the whole story from birth to death and I'd consider it an essential buy if you have an interest in the line.
Friday, September 11, 2020
Another old photo from the 1980s and Carnforth steam museum. This is (I think) a hopper wagon that would have been used to transfer fuel from a coaling stage to the tender of a steam locomotive.
Some types of tub would run out along a short track until they we upended to coal the loco. This has bottom doors, so I assume ran out over the tender, the doors were opened and out fell the coal.
It's a pretty filthy manual business, which is why the railways struggled to retain staff and lead to the rush to dieselise. Steam locos might be romantic, but I suspect the appeal fades when you are up at the crack of dawn in midwinter to prepare one!
Thursday, September 10, 2020
I've dug out the mallet for the October BRM TV session - the baseboards for Selly Oak are built (OK, one of them is) right in front of your eyes from a laser-cut kit.
Some people will consider paying for boards wildly extravagant, but if you are going to spend money on your layout, a firm foundation for the model will provide better value then another locomotive. Dodgy boards will be a constant source of frustration, so if you are as rubbish at woodwork as I am, it's worth paying someone to help.
Wednesday, September 09, 2020
The second Selly Oak model spins one of the baseboards 90 degrees to provide a 3ft deep scene that gives me much more road space at the cost of some railway length.
We've taken more liberties with the prototype - that centre industrial/scruffy space is a lot smaller for a start, and the pair of canal branches are gone. A road runs down in front of the arches, which will be blocked in to provide space of businesses.
If you look at the third photo down on this page, there appears to be a gateway where I have added one. Click on it for the more modern view and that roadways is definitely there. Lock-ups under the arches are pretty much a given too as well as making the modelling easier and more interesting.
Another liberty is the addition of a bus stop with pull-in. There really is a stop at this point, presumably for both station and factory, but it's just a plain bit of road marked with an easy-to-ignore pole. We need parking, there should have been more bus space in real life, so we'll fix this on the model.
All this has changed the angles where road, rail and canal cross each other, but I'll deal with that in due coarse.
The important thing is this plan ticks all the boxes. Now I just need to build it.
Tuesday, September 08, 2020
There's not a lot of drawing to do with Selly Oak. After all, the railway side is a double-track line with no pointwork. No need to fire up AnyRail for that!
However, the plan involves several different ground levels and the best way, for me at least, to understand that is to build a model of the model.
Using Daler Board, I created the basic baseboard shape and marked it out with 1cm squares representing 6 inches.
The plan involves a pair of 3ft by 2ft baseboards. I can't accommodate anything longer and since this model focusses on model buses, the scene doesn't need to be too long. We can always extend later if more train space is required.
I'm also trying to keep the project sensible. It needs to be completed by the end of November 2020, not take as long as Pendon. With this in mind, the canal is forms the front edge and the massive factory that should be where the viewer is standing is simply ignored. Much as I love an industrial scene, all I have to work with are some aerial shots and very little detail. Besides, there were no buses, so we're not interested.
The main road runs from the front right under the bridge. A side road heads to the station, it's a bit bigger than real life, but would allow more bus parking. The industrial/scruffy area in the middle needs work, but I've left in a pair of branches from the canal that disappeared around the period modelled, but we can't be sure exactly when.
Most of Birmingham will be on the backscene, including the famous university clock tower. First thoughts around this are something impressionistic rather than trying to create a photo. There have been so many changes to the landscape you'd be starting from scratch anyway. More to the point, we want the focus on the model, not the stuff behind the railway.
Why is this V1? Because there's not enough road and bus space. More thinking was required.
Monday, September 07, 2020
Regular blog readers will remember that a couple of years ago, I was asked to build a layout for Rapido Trains. The model was shipped (with me) to Canada, put on display and then given away.
Well, they are back for more.
This time, I've been commissioned to build a model based on Selly Oak. It seems that this will be the perfect place to display their growing range of Brummie Buses.
Because this is all about buses, the main railway feature will be a bridge. The one in the photo above. There will be railway of course and I've been visiting the site to take photos and get a feel for the place - who says railway modelling doesn't take you to some lovely locations?
The centrepiece of the model will be a chunk of Bristol Road between the railway and canal bridges. You can walk it on Streetview:
Obviously, since this isn't canalview, you can't see the bridge, so here it is:
Sunday, September 06, 2020
When I started with BRM, we had 12 magazines a year to produce. And the hordes on RMweb to wrangle.
Then along came a DVD which has evolved into BRM TV. We upped magazine production to 13 per annum. A few years later, a free weekly newsletter. Then the World of Railways website. Next (for me) Garden Rail. We publish on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. More recently, we ran our first virtual show with another in a few months time. And there is more new stuff to come.
Once upon a time, a model railway magazine team could sit back and rely on a monthly letters page to communicate with readers. We now find ourselves working with e-mail, Facebook messenger, Twitter and of course, RMweb.
The users of each tend to be very loyal to their chosen platforms - I
keep talking with potential contributors via Facebook and having to
direct them to e-mail as the photos they are sending me need to be large
for publication, not shrunk by the Zuckerberg machine. Oh, and don't
think office hours will do - there are plenty who will message over the
weekend and complain when a reply isn't instant!
Add in the joys of Covid, and my job is evolving at a rate of knots.
We've lots of exciting ideas floating around and the one common theme is
that for the moment, the workload is only going to increase. And I want
to grab all the opportunities to get involved with everything.
Sadly, something has got to give, and that is going to be this blog.
Much as I love my blog, and am really proud of it, the pressure of producing enough material for a post a day is going to be too great over the next few months.
This doesn't mean no blog - that's too big a step to take - it just means that I'm not going to have time for my own projects for a while.
I do have a major project starting tomorrow and that will generate plenty of posts, at least initially. Although some of this will be magazine fodder, this forms only a small part of the job. The rest appears on here.
I'm not sure when the gaps will appear, and it's going to hurt the first time one does, but I need to do this. If anyone fancies helping out with the odd guest post, please let me know. For the moment, I'm sticking this out there so that when there is a post-free day or two, regular readers won't think I've fallen down a hole somewhere. Just hang around and another post will be along eventually.
The one thing I know about the future is that it will be different from today. Who knows what tomorrow will bring?*
*Actually, on here I do, but that's another story.
Saturday, September 05, 2020
OK, so we can't travel on the Wuppertal at the moment - not thanks to Covid, but due to some dodgy tyres on the trains. Thanks to the Museum of Modern Art, we can take a trip in 1902 though.
Friday, September 04, 2020
Digging through some old photos, I find another skip chassis variant - a small van that sat in the entrance to Steamtown, Carnforth, back in the 1980s.
I'm sure this was a home-brewed conversion and I doubt it was of great practical use, but it looks nice and has probably long since been scrapped.
Thursday, September 03, 2020
While we are on the subject of boxes (see Tuesday's post) I also needed to find a way to protect Furness Quay while it is in storage.
The problem of old layouts is a growing one for me. I ought to get rid of some, but the Quay is likely to prove useful as a photo backdrop and so while I have it, I want the think kept tidy so it can be pressed into service quickly and not need a refurbishment every time.
The basic principle is the same as for loco and boat boxes, there's just a bit more wood involved. And some slightly less accurate measuring resulting in a little bodgery with the corner strengtheners to buy a few mm width.
A little modification was required to fit the fiddle yard in with the layout, but nothing that a few minutes on the mitre couldn't solve, followed by re-fixing the end into the shortened yard. As it was, I didn't need to cut through the track, almost like I'd planned it!
The layout is now nice and snug in its storage and hopefully will be fine in the future.
Wednesday, September 02, 2020
Canal spotting in Birmingham, I found this bridge with a very narrow section of waterway underneath it. Modern canal boats are 6ft 10inches wide and there was, I estimate, less than a foot of space each side of the boat.
That's probably not too challenging with a short vessel on a calm day, but a 70ft boat in the middle of a winter storm? I bet there was a lot of bouncing off the sides even allowing for a well practised captain and the shelter afforded by the railway embankment.
Tuesday, September 01, 2020
There's not a lot of space under a Binnie skip wagon to add weight, so my method is an imperfect bodge.
Round balls of lead from an old scuba diving weight pack are dipped in Poundland 2-part Epoxy glue and placed under the central spine of the chassis.
A line of them raises the weight from 50 to 65g - not a massive increase, but it feels useful and in the hand, the model certainly seems more solid. They roll better too, less rattly then the pure plastic version.
Sadly, you can see the bottoms of the balls, but I'm not going to worry as they will be less obvious once on the track and the dirty grey merges into the background quite well. To be honest, since they stay on the rail, I'm happy.
Monday, August 31, 2020
Willi didn't arrive with a carrying box. The postman delivered him well packed, in an old Amazon cardboard box. By the time I'd hacked away all the sticky tape holding it shut, that wasn't going to do the job containing him in the future.
For years, we've made boxes for model boats, so producing something suitable for a small steam locomotive wasn't going to be much of a problem.
The main parts are cut from 6mm plywood by our local wood shop. They do an excellent job with everything being straight and square. The open-fronted box is assembled with PVA and some 6mm square stripwood strengtheners.
Once dry, the angled pieces to hold the sliding front are added. There's usually a bit of faffing around with the measurements on these, but they are soon glued in place as well.
Finally, the box is given three coats of Ronseal hard gloss varnish - the stuff that dries super-fast and the brush can be cleaned with water. I like to sand between each for a nice finish and to make sure the door slides in an out without too much effort. On that score, let the varnish harden overnight before slotting it into place.
A couple of stripwood lengths stop the model sliding back and forth. I'd put them lengthways except the loco can run in 32 and 45mm gauges and getting those right was a fiddle. This way works nicely anyway.
I'm pleased with the box and have another under construction for the Piko "Clean Machine", a loco that is properly packed, but the packing is a nuisance to extract it from and this will be so much easier. And better looking.
Sunday, August 30, 2020
No not me, there's no chance I'll ever be able to retire - it's the good looking one on the right in this photo.
From the Douglas Bay Horse tramways online pages:
Strawberry roan Clydesdale "Philip", who is 21 years old this year and started tramming back in 2003, retired from the tramway yesterday and will be joining friends and former stable-mates at the Isle of Man Home of Rest for old horses.
Yes, my namesake has retired from a life of hauling tourists along Douglas prom and will live out his days at the fantastic retirement home. He has a life of wandering around spacious fields, munching grass and being fed pony nuts by eager visitors to look forward too.
All of this costs money, so as soon as I heard, I was on the phone to sponsor him. This only costs a tenner a year and when you see how well the animals are looking after, it well worth the tiny expense. If I can't travel on a Philip-powered tram, at least I can help keep him in nibbles.
If you fancy sponsoring a horse, head over the Home of Rest for old horses website - and if you ever make it over to the Isle of Man, pay them a visit.
Saturday, August 29, 2020
I'm not good with heights, so I'm not sure if I envy anyone heading up to the top of the Forth Rail bridge. Mind you, it's a lift and the platform at the top is pretty big, so I could probably do this. Sadly, not something I'm likely to get the chance to do, but at least we can go there in video.
Friday, August 28, 2020
My Migo Splat has a broken leg. It was fine and then suddenly things went wonky and useless.
This flexible tripod is invaluable, as I explained back in February, so a replacement has been purchased. £18 for something I use a lot isn't a bad buy, or at least I've spent more money for less useful stuff in the past. And so have you, so stop sniggering.
I couldn't throw the Splat away without doing a bit of digging though. What's inside?
Cutting carefully down each leg allowed me to peel the rubber away and reveal a flexible steel (I think) set of legs. One of these had fractured, hence the problem. At least I know now.
Thursday, August 27, 2020
Willi needs a train, and everything I have in 45mm gauge, for the line in our garden, is a bit LGB. Lovely, but hardly approproate for our vertical boiler loco.
No problem - a few quid thrown at Peter Binne and a couple of days later, a box full of kits arrives.
We chose Hudson skip wagons. At a tenner each, they are cheap and easy to assemble. A coat of red oxide primer followed by a dry-brush of Humbrol No.70 does the job for the initial paintwork. I plan to try some rust replication products on them later, but want a working train first.
A couple of chassis were also added to the order and these have been turned into flat wagons - you can read how I did this on World of Railways. (Go, on click on the link. It will be funny if this blog makes it into the higher levels of the monthly stats report) A process that's pretty painless and yet the results really (to my eye) look good.
The train is 77cm long - plenty for a little loco and it should look nice snaking around the line. Being plastic, the wagons are quite light, but I'll glue some lead under the central rib initially. If they need more, some dummy loads will be required.
Wednesday, August 26, 2020
Other than this is in the Isle of Man motor museum, I can't tell you anything useful about this hovercraft - other than it is seriously cool*.
Building a model hovercraft has always been on my radar, but they are horribly technical things. You spend more time worrying about weight distribution than details. After all, you want the model to work, not just looks good.
Then there is the small matter of controlling the thing. Hovercraft don't work like boats, you have to plan your steering ahead of when you want to change direction. Despite this, I've always fancied having a go in a small one...
And yes, that is an Amphicar in the background. This place is amazing.
*as if I would be any judge of this.
Tuesday, August 25, 2020
For the final shots of the tugboat, I wanted to sit it on some brown water. The obvious choice would be the model boat club, but we're having to book in there to keep numbers down and I hadn't had the chance to do this when a sunny day appeared.
With a trip to pick up some wood required, I decided to try sailing on the canal. This was easier said than done as I wanted a nice, quiet spot. The first places I looked at were full of moored boats, or I could park anywhere near. Without a proper box for the model I didn't want to risk lugging it very far.
Eventually, I found a spot on the edge of Warwick and set up. The water wasn't too far from the bank, another issue with the boat club at the moment, and the boat behaved itself when afloat. I was holding the camera and randomly aiming, but this worked OK. In a shady, spot, the flash made shots look better, the same as when I'm in the more controlled environment of the lake.
The slight current kept the model on the move, but it easily overcame this and pootled around happily enough. Even a passing boat didn't seem to bother it.
I've enjoyed building this kit. Everything seems to go together well and the modifications required to fit radio control didn't cause any big problems. Now finished and weathered, I think it looks great. Maybe all those plastic handrails make it a bit fragile, I can live with this was it's a fair-weather model that demands calm water. Perhaps not a "Thursday Boat" I can take out at a moments notice, it will stand up to a big of use. There's not much point in fitting radio if you can't sail after all.
There are several other kits in this range. While they are probably very rare, I'll certainly be looking out for them.
Monday, August 24, 2020
After testing on the water, I found a couple of little tweaks I wanted to make to the tugboat .
First, every time the superstructure wobbled, I was nervous it would fall into the water and sink. The retaining pieces provided aren't generous, so a 1cm tall wall is fixed inside the deck hole. Not only will this reduce the chances of the wheelhouse falling off, it will keep any water that makes its way on to the deck from getting it to the working gubbins.
While I'm at it, the superstructure is tied to the hull with a length of very thin wire. If it falls off, hopefully this will allow me to retrieve it. I've done the same for other boats and at least once been very glad I did.
Talking of the wheelhouse, the caption was rattling around having come unglued. Easing a knife blade under the edges and breaking the glue joint gave me access and I fixed him down again.
Once happy the glue had dried, I put the wheelhouse top on, and it wouldn't sit properly. A few minutes prodding and wobbling the part lead me to realise the problem is he's too tall! Somehow, Lindberg made a mistake and if you want a man at the wheel, you have to file down his cap or chop off his feet.
Since it's hard to see inside, I have gone for option 3, have him standing outside and hope no-one notices the ghost steered ship. The figures are too nicely made to hide away in the gloom anyway.
I see I need to get some dirt under the lip of the funnel too...
Sunday, August 23, 2020
My Nikon D5000 has died.
When I switch it on, the lights in the viewfinder flash on and then there is nothing. My first thought was a faulty battery, but the replacement works no better.
Now, this might be a known problem. The D5000 was offered a free repair by Nikon, but this expired 2 years ago. The problem this was to fix involved not powering up, so an e-mail has been sent to the company to find out if they can suggest anything.
In the meantime, I've been thinking.
Let's assume the camera is dead. Should I replace it?
The more I think about it, the more the answer is no. Quite simply, the photos I take can be taken on a quality compact.
My magazine work is carried out with the Canon G12. With suitable software, it offers variable focusing for stacking. It feels great and although obsolete, good second hand examples can still be found. I have three - two workhorses and a spare I bought NOS. It does everything I need.
For other shots, I have three compacts - Fujifilm AX650, Panasonic DMC-TZ8 and Olympus SZ-17. None is exciting and all are old, but they do the job. Plenty of pixels and the Olympus has a breathtaking zoom. All also do a decent job of video work. With 12-16 megapixels on offer from each, unless I want to shoot for a billboard, they are fine. And they fit in my pocket.
On that basis, the case for a replacement DSLR isn't great. I enjoy using the Nikon but it's far from perfect. The flip out screen slows the autofocus from plodding to glacial. It's not great in low light, far worse than any of the compacts. Don't try to freeze loco on the move, sport mode is hopeless.
The standard 50mm zoom isn't as impressive as the smaller brethren. I know I can buy more lenses, but that's more cost and more stuff to lug around.
The biggest problem is my photography. I tend to leave the camera on auto and let it get on with things. I like composing an image, I can't be arsed with the fiddly technical bits and for 99% of the time, I don't need to for any of the cameras.
I use photos in print, but even a mobile phone camera used correctly can be good enough for that. Many of my pictures are shared online and every camera has been producing high enough resolutions for that for decades.
"But proper photographers have a DSLR" I hear people cry. Well, I've had to work with the results from people with "proper" cameras and you know what? Some of them aren't impressive. Boast about editing in raw all you like, but when the photos have buffers or half a signal arm cropped off because you didn't point it in the right direction, then shut up.
Likewise, if you have a camera that costs well into four figures but I end up with photos with soft-focus loco faces, then it's time you learnt to point, half-squeeze and then frame the shot. Yes, the middle of the loco is in focus, but that doesn't look right does it?
There is a phrase that covers it - All the gear and no idea.
There is one reason, and one reason only I can see to replace the Nikon. Using it makes me feel like a "proper photographer".
I've used SLRs since my early Zeniths and enjoy handling them, but do I enjoy handling them enough to shell out for another?